Citation
Data
  • Category: Derivative
Detail
  • Author: William Freeman Fox
  • Publisher: 1909
Images
Page: 7
  • Pages: 7-9, 12-14
  • Text: Introductory

    For more than a quarter of a century I have been searching among the records of New England in an endeavor to gather additional facts relating to the descendants of Thomas Fox of Concord, Mass. My own line of descent I had perfected long ago but I desired a more complete knowledge of collateral lines.

    During my early search I found how little trust could be placed in the genealogies which are given in the local histories of many New England towns, and, also, that there were many slips in Savage's great "Genealogical Dictionary." Mr. Baker in his "History of Montville" makes a sad mix-up of the Foxes of New London. He gives the first wife of Thomas Fox of Concord, the founder of the family, as Rebecca French. This first wife is mentioned only as Rebecca; her family name is not known. The Rebecca French came into the family nearly a century later, as the wife of Thomas Fox (Eliphalet). Mr. Baker had failed to discover--a fact that had also escaped Miss Caulkins--that Isaac Fox the youngest son of Thomas of Concord, had come down with his family a little before 1700, and settled near his brothers Samuel, and John, and sister, Hannah Lester, in the "General Neck" a few miles south of New London village. In trying to account for this Isaac Fox and his family as the children of Samuel and John, Baker has helped to increase the confusion.

    Again, in relation to two Benjamin Foxes of the third generation--the Benjamin who dwelt in New London, and the Benjamin who dwelt in Colchester--the former has been with much persistency treated as the son of Samuel, and the latter as the son of John, when the New London records, as well as Hempstead's Diary, show beyond question that the reverse was the case. Mr. Baker has also given the wife of Samuel Fox the elder (so designated because he had a younger brother also named Samuel, who was known as Samuel Fox the younger), as Margaret Brintnall, doubtless basing his guess on the fact that a son, Ezekiel Fox, had named a son Brintnall. The fact is, however, that Samuel Fox the elder married Margaret, the daughter of Samuel Stebbins, March 25, 1703. The name "Brintnall" came into the family through the wife of Ezekiel, she being Mehitable Lamson of Boston, and the maiden name of her mother being Mehitable Brintnall. I have mentioned the above in hope that it will save some Fox hunters the trouble and confusion that will result if they follow the false clues corrected here.

    ...

    It has been suggested that Thomas Fox of Concord was the son of his contemporary, Thomas Fox of Cambridge. I do not think this is so, although I am sure that Thomas Fox of Cambridge was the elder. He was born about 1608, and was, doubtless, the Thomas Fox made freeman in 1638. Thomas Fox of Concord was then the one made freeman in 1644, and was therefore born as early as 1623 (it was not until 1645 that a man under twenty one years of age could be made freeman) when Thomas Fox of Cambridge was but fifteen years old. It is probable that Thomas Fox of Concord was born as early as 1620; and that he married his first wife, Rebecca, about 1641, or perhaps earlier. He was the brother-in-law of Eleazer Bateman and Moses Wheate. Eleazer Bateman doubtless married a sister of Hannah Brooks, Martha, who died in 1665.

    I hope that some day some one of the descendants of Thomas Fox of Concord, with money enough to indulge in luxuries, may be stirred to trace his English ancestry. An absurd line has been given him in Stiles's new history of Windsor, Conn., giving him left-handed royal descent, as a grandson of Sir Stephen Fox--and a son of Henry--and a brother of the statesman, Charles James Fox. If this is true, we have a case of a man who is older than his grandfather. Thomas Fox was a man older than Sir Stephen, and he had lived his span and been gathered to his fathers ninety years before his alleged brother, Charles James Fox, was born. A little thing like chronology, however, should not be permitted to stand in the way when you want a royal ancestor.

    S. M. Fox
    Manhattan, Kansas
Page: 15
  • Pages: 15-17
  • Text: First Generation

    Thomas Fox of Concord, Mass., was an Englishman who emigrated to America prior to March, 1644, at which time he was elected a freeman of the Massachusetts Colony. His name appears on the rolls of the Concord church. According to one authority he came to America in 1630, in the train of Governor Cradock. Thomas of Concord was married twice. By his first wife, Rebecca, he had children: Mary, born September 18, 1642, Elizabeth, born September 18, 1642, twins; Eliphalet, born 1644.

    Rebecca, his first wife, died May 11, 1647.

    Thomas married for his second wife Hannah Brooks, daughter of Henry Brooks, of Woburn, Mass. They were married December 13, 1647, and had children: Hannah, born September 25, 1648: Thomas, born February 26, 1649-50; Samuel, born 1651; John, born about 1653; David, born about 1656; Isaac, born October 17, 1657.

    It will be noted that the above assignment of children to the second wife of Thomas Fox of Concord, does not follow Savage, the genealogist, who made a manifest error in including a daughter Mary.

    Thomas Fox died at Concord, Mass., April 14, 1658. In his will dated January 25, 1658, he makes his wife, Hannah, an executrix. This will names only the eldest son, Eliphalet, and his daughter, Elizabeth, although it speaks of others. It mentions also Uncle Thomas Brooks, who returned the inventory April 23, 1658.

    In signing his will, Thomas spells his name "ffoxe." His signature is accompanied by a seal displaying a coat of arms, which may have given rise to the tradition mentioned by some genealogists that he was a descendant of the Rev. John Ffoxe of England, author of the famous "Book of Martyrs," and who, in recognition of this work, received from his sovereign a royal grant, giving him the right to a coat of arms.

    There was another Thomas Fox who at one time lived in Concord, and who moved from there to Cambridge, Mass. He is always referred to by genealogists as Thomas of Cambridge to distinguish him from Thomas of Concord. As both lived in Concord at one time, there is a tradition that they were cousins.

    Thomas of Cambridge was made a freeman in 1638 and a selectman in 1658. He was an older man than Thomas of Concord He was married three times, but "had no children except Jabez (born 1647, Harvard College, 1665) to bear up the uncertain traditional honor ascribed to him of descent from the author of the Book of Martyrs." [Savage's New England Genealogies.] This Jabez Fox was a clergyman; and his son, Rev. John Fox, and grandson, Hon. Jabez Fox, were also graduates of Harvard. Thomas Fox of Cambridge died April 25, 1693, aged 85.*

    * For his descendants see volume "Descendants of Thomas Fox of Cambridge, Mass., by N. M. Fox, Union Printing Co., St Joseph, Mo., 1899.
Page: 19
  • Pages: 19-21
  • Text: Second Generation

    Samuel Fox, son of Thomas of Concord, was born in Concord, Mass., in 1651. He settled in New London, Conn., about 1675. He married there, March 30, 1676, Mary Lester, daughter of Andrew Lester. She was born in Gloucester, Mass., December 26, 1647. After this he contracted a second, third, and fourth marriage. His second wife, Joanna, died in the epidemic of 1689. His third wife, whom he married in 1690, was Bathsheba--or Bathshua--Rogers, widow of Richard Smith. She died November 3, 1711. Bathsheba was born in Milford in 1650, and was the daughter of James Rogers, "the wealthiest man in the colony of New London after Governor Winthrop." Samuel's fourth wife, who survived him, was named Esther, and is mentioned in his will. She was probably the "Hester" Allen who was married to "Samuel Fox of New London," August 9, 1715.

    Samuel's name was added to the roll of the "First Church of Christ in New London," November 20, 1681. The Patent of New London, issued in 1704, also contains his name. He was an extensive landholder, some of his land being situated at Great Neck, in the vicinity of New London. He also owned 500 acres in the North Parish, now Montville, upon which he erected a sawmill and a gristmill.

    He died September 4, 1727, aged seventy six years. His will dated April 6, 1727, and admitted to probate September 6th following, names his wife, Esther Fox; and his son, Samuel, spoken of as his eldest son and called "Samuel Fox the elder," and another son, whom he calls, "Samuel Fox the younger;" also his sons, Isaac and Benjamin; and his daughters, Elizabeth and Anna. This will also mentions his sons-in-law, James Smith and John Smith; the children of his "daughter-in-law (stepdaughter) Bathshua Rogers, deceased;" the children of his daughter-in-law, Elizabeth Camp, deceased; and his granddaughter, Elizabeth Platt.

    He gives to his son, Samuel the elder, his lands in the North Parish, with the mills known as the Fox mills, and all his wearing apparel. He gives to his son, Samuel the younger, all his farming tools, and all his lands in Newbern, with Great Neck, subject to certain legacies which are to be paid to other children. He gives to his wife, Esther, a living out of the whole, and appoints as executors his son, Samuel, and "his friend," Timothy Green.

    Samuel Fox, son of Thomas of Concord, had children: Abigail, Elizabeth, Anna, Samuel, Isaac, Benjamin and Samuel. Of these, Abigail, Elizabeth, Anna, and Samuel "the elder," were the children of Mary Lester, his first wife; Isaac and Benjamin were the children of Joanna, his second wife; and Samuel "the younger" was the son of Bathshua, his third wife.

    It was not unusual in that day to give the same name to two children by a different mother; and the repetition is not always an indication that the first named had died before the birth of the other.

    Samuel and Bathsheba, after their marriage, became Seventh Day Baptists. Samuel was arraigned once for catching eels on Sunday, whereupon he said that he made no difference in days; and Bathsheba went "openly" to the meeting-house to proclaim that she had been doing servile work on their Sabbath. She was accompanied at this time by her brother, John Rogers, who interrupted the minister by proclaiming that he had committed a similar offense. This John Rogers became the founder of the sect of Rogerenes. Samuel and Bathsheba seemed to have courted persecution and to have taken no pains to avoid the martyrdom which fell to their lot. Bathsheba's brother, James, was sentenced by the court to receive fifteen lashes and to pay a fine of 5 pounds for "rebaptizing" people.

    The troubles and differences which Samuel Fox had with his neighbors appear to have resulted from his marriage with Bathsheba. Her father, James Rogers, and his children also, as early as 1676, attracted attention by their declared opposition to infant baptism, and Samuel evidently was a convert to their views.
Page: 25
  • Pages: 25-26
  • Text: Third Generation

    Samuel Fox, oldest son of Samuel, was born in New London, Conn., April 24, 1681, and was baptized April 9, 1682. He married March 25, 1703, Margaret, daughter of Daniel and Bethia (Comstock) Stebbins.* She was born November 3, 1680; died October 4, 1752. Samuel married again, April 27, 1753, taking for his second wife Zipporah, the daughter of John Bolles. He settled on the land bequeathed to him by his father, which was situated in the north parish of New London, and in what is now known as the town of Montville. His father had built a sawmill and gristmill on the property, and the place became known as Fox's Mills. Samuel "the elder" was the first settler here, and is the ancestor of most of the Foxes of Montville. He lived on this farm until his death, which occurred February 12, 1754, in his seventy-third year, and was buried on the farm, a short distance from his house, in what is called the "Fox burying ground." This farm is still owned and occupied by his descendants. Samuel the elder and wife, Margaret, had children: Samuel, Bathshua, Margaret, Elizabeth, Content, Amy, Caron (or Keron), and Ezekiel.

    *Baker's History of Montville says that Samuel the elder married Margaret Brintnall, a manifest error as shown in the vital statistics of the town, recorded at that time.
Page: 35
  • Pages: 35-36
  • Text: Fourth Generation

    Samuel Fox, son of Samuel the elder, Samuel, Thomas, was born about 1707. He married Abigail Harris, November 12, 1729. He died about 1785, his will having been admitted to probate on April 12th of that year. He had children: Margaret, Sarah, Abigail, Amy, Delight, Anna, Elisha, Zoviah, Rachel, Alpheus, and Abigail.
Page: 59
  • Pages: 59-63
  • Text: Appendix

    The Will of Thomas Fox of Concord, Mass.
    Died April 14, 1658

    I, Thomas Fox of Concord, in the county of Middlesex, in Massachusetts Colony, being feeble and weak in body but of sound mind and memory, do make this my last will and testament in manner and form following: First, I commit and commend my soul unto the hands of the Lord, my God, submitting in the richness of His grace that he hath redeemed it by the precious blood of Christ Jesus; that my body be decently buried, believing that though soul and body be separated for a time, yet they shall be united again at the resurrection of the just to reign with Christ in eternal glory; and for the outward state which the Lord hath been gratified to give me, I for the present leave both house and lands, cattle and moveables, in the possession of my wife, Hannah, and my will is that she shall have and hold all until my eldest son, Eliphalet, shall arrive at the age of one and twenty years, and then in case my said son, Eliphalet, will then undertake the payment of five pounds to each of the rest of my children as they shall come to the said age of one and twenty years, that then he shall have and enjoy two-thirds of the land and meadow, my said wife enjoying the said dwelling house and a third part of the barn and of the land during the term of her life except in the case, however, accepted, and after her decease then the other third part of the land, with the house and appurtenances to return to my said son Eliphalet. But in case he shall refuse to pay the said portion to the rest of my children--to my daughter, Elizabeth, five pounds within one year after and to the rest at the day of one and twenty years--that then my said wife, Hannah, shall pay or cause to be paid by her executors and assigns to my said son, Eliphalet, the sum of ten pounds within six months after the said refusal, and she shall have full power to dispose of the said house and lands to one or more of the rest of my sons as she shall think most meet; and he or they to whom they are disposed shall give to the rest of my children the said sum of five pounds apiece at the time and age aforesaid; also my will is that the said house and lands shall remain to one or more of said sons except those * * * of selling part of the land for the payment of said portions; and in case part be sold my will is that no part of the house lot from the said house, nor two acres of land at the lower end, in Brickkilnfield, nor an acre and a half in Tompkins meadow beyond C_____field. But what other parts of the said land or meadow shall or they shall see cause to sell they have liberty and power so to do. Also my will is that in case my said son, Eliphalet, shall accept the said two-thirds of the land at the age of one and twenty years on the terms aforesaid that my said wife, Hannah, shall hold for her two-third part during her life, with the house and a third part of the barn, an acre of plow land usually called the hollow on the top of the hill behind the house, and all of the house lot below the house on the other side of the highway, and the said two acres in Brickkilnfield and the two acres of meadow before excepted and six acres of new land adjoining to my house lot meadow. Also in case my said wife, Hannah, be married to another man and shall not live in the said house and land when the said Eliphalet shall be one and twenty years old that then in case he shall accept the land on the terms aforesaid he shall also enjoy the house and the whole house lot and the other parts before excepted, so giving to my said wife yearly during her life the third part of the yearly worth of the whole as it shall be judged to be worth by the year. Also in case my said wife, Hannah, dies before my said son, Eliphlet, let, come to the age aforesaid that then the overseers of this my will hereunder mentioned or their assigns for that purpose shall have power to * * * and dispose of things for the benefit of my said children as the said Hannah hath in case she live, and my said son, Eliphalet, refuse to accept the land on the terms aforesaid. Also the overseers shall have power to dispose of all of my children to trades and abroad as they shall see cause, only my said wife, Hannah, hath liberty to choose any one of them I had by her to continue with her. Also I appoint and constitute my said wife, Hannah, the executor of this my last will and testament for the payment of debts and overseeing the estate in lands and chattels until my said son, Eliphalet, be at the said age ot one and twenty years, and the two-thirds of the land to come to him if he accept thereof as aforesaid, but otherwise to dispose of things as is before expressed, and whether she live till that time or not shall have when she dies full power to dispose of the chattels and moveables as she shall think best. Also I appoint and constitute my loving uncle, Thomas Brooks, my loving brethren, Moses Wheate and Thomas Bateman, and my loving friend and neighbor, Robert Fletcher, the overseers of this my last will and testament.

    In witness whereof I, the said Thomas Ffoxe, have hereunto set my hand and seal this 25th day of January, 1657.

    Thomas ffoxe

    Witness whereof
    Edward Bulkley
    Robert Fletcher

    This was witnessed upon oath by those above written the 14:10:1658.
    Before me
    Simon Willard

    At a county court, held at Charlestown, June 14, '58, Major Simon Willard was appointed by the court to take the attest and exhibit of the will of Thomas Ffoxe as attested.

    Thomas Danforth.

    Entered and recorded, 22:10: '58 and '59, lib. I.

    As attest:

    THOMAS DANFORTH, Recorder.
Page: 64
  • Pages: 64-69
  • Text: Appendix

    The Will of Samuel Fox of New London,
    Comm., Son of Thomas Fix of
    Concord, Mass.

    In the name of God, amen, I, Samuel Fox, of New London, in the colony of Connecticut, in New England, being in health and in perfect memory, but calling to mind the mortality of my body and that it is appointed for man once to die, and not knowing how soon my change may be and desiring that there may be peace left amongst those that I shall leave behind me, do now make this my last will and testament (hereby revoking all other wills made by me) in manner following:

    First, I bequeath my soul to God that gave it to me nothing doubting, but at the great and last day my soul and body will be united and stand before my Judge with perfect hope of happiness to all eternity through the merits of my Saviour and dear Redeemer, our Lord Jesus Christ.

    Imprimis: My will is that my body be decently buried at the discretion of my executors hereafter named and appointed by me; and that my just debts and funeral charges be first paid out of my estate. I dispose of the remainder of my estate, both real and personal, as follows, viz.:

    I give unto my wife, Esther Fox, all the estate that she brought with her to me when I married her; I mean all that shall be left at my decease, she making it to appear to be such to the satisfaction of my executors, or either of them, and to have an honorable maintenance out of my estate during her widowhood in manner hereafter mentioned, my wife disclaiming any dower in my lands.

    I give unto my, son Samuel Fox, the elder, my wearing apparel of all sorts which, with what he hath already received of me formerly and an equal share I by this my will give to my said son, Samuel Fox the elder, with others of my children hereafter described, which I judge is sufficient in consideration of his being my eldest son.

    I give and bequeath unto my younger son, Samuel Fox, all my ploughs and plough tackling, carts and cart wheels, with all chains and husbandry tools of any sort whatsoever. And my will is that all my lands in New London, in a place called the General Neck, be it called by what name or names soever, be first offered to my said son, Samuel Fox the younger, at the price that they shall be appraised by men as the law directs after my decease to be paid unto my executors by my son, Samuel Fox the younger, which money shall be disposed in among my children, as hereafter expressed. Always it is to be understood that I do not my * * * where I now live, to be prized to my son, Samuel Fox the younger, but only that part of it which is not given to him by a deed of gift under my hand and seal. And in case my said son, Samuel Fox the younger, do not see cause to take said lands as appraised in manner as aforesaid that my will is that I give said land above mentioned to be appraised to my other children--namely, Samuel Fox the elder, Isaac Fox, Benjamin Fox, my daughters, Elizabeth and Anna--to be equally divided amongst them, excepting to my son, Benjamin Fox, and he to have only half so much as any of the rest. Considering that the one-half, with what he hath already given him by me be his full shares or portion, to them and their heirs and assigns forever to be set out to my above said children by men chosen by Timothy Green, of New London, printer. My will is that out of my estate be given to the children of my daughter-in-law, Bathshua Rogers (deceased), the sum of ten pounds money to be equally divided amongst them. I give unto my son-in-law, James Smith, the sum of forty pounds money. I give unto my son-in-law, John Smith, the sum of twenty shillings which, with what I have given him already, I think to be sufficient for him. I give unto the children of my daughter-in-law, Elizabeth Camp (deceased), the sum of ten pounds, to be equally divided amongst them.

    I give unto my grand daughter, Elizabeth Platts, the sum of ten pounds money.

    My will is that if any of my children happen to fall in debt to me at my decease it shall be allowed as so much of their portion, and if any of them are more in debt than their parts will come to the overplus to be paid to my executors.

    My will is that Timothy Green and my eldest son, Samuel Fox, be the executors of this, my last will and testament, and that they be honorably allowed out of my estate for their care and trouble about the same. Also I do appoint Timothy Green one of my executors to take care of my wife, Esther Fox, and see that she hath an honorable maintenance out of my estate during her widowhood, and I do give unto my executor, Timothy Green, full power to keep so much of my estate in his hands as he may judge needful for her subsistence and his trouble about the same during her widowhood, and at her decease all my estate to be equally divided among my children as above said.

    And I do appoint my said executor, Timothy Green, to set out to my eldest son, Samuel Fox, his part of my estate here given to him as equally as he can in his judgment think right, and I do appoint my executors to set out and make a division of my estate to the rest of my children.

    And I do declare this instrument (written on the other side of this paper) to be my last will and testament.

    In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 6th day of April, in the thirteenth year of the reign of King George and in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and twenty seven.

    SAMUEL FOX.

    Signed, sealed, pronounced and declared by the aforesaid Samuel Fox, the testator, to be his last will and testament in presence of us.

    John Adams,
    Joshua Plumbe,
    Boradell Latimer.

    The above appeared before a court of probate held in New London, September 6, 1727, and made solemn oath that they saw the above named testator sign and seal the above and on the other written testament, and heard him pronounce and declare the same to be his last will and testament, and that he the said testator was then of a sound and disposing mind and memory according to the best deponent's judgments and that they did together set their hands thereto as witnesses in the presence of the said testator.

    Test: Richard Christopher.
    Clerk

    Recorded in book 5 of wills for county of New London, folio 219 220, September 13, 1727.
    Copied in Book C, New London probate records, pages 233, 234, 235.
    Amount of inventory of estate, 2,280 pounds 11s 5 1/2d.
Personal Names
PersonClaimDetailEvidence
Abigail HarrisNameAbigail Harris [S2053] [S2055:132] [S2055:365] [S2056:37] [S2075:35] [S2080:41] [S2080:46]
secondary
Anna FoxNameAnna Fox [S2055:365] [S2056:17] [S2056:37] [S2057:52] [S2075:35]
derivative
Bethiah ComstockNameBethia Comstock [S2055:132] [S2055:419] [S2075:25] [S2077:673] [S2078:1022] [S2078:1023]
derivative
Daniel StebbinsNameDaniel Stebbins [S366:704] [S2053] [S2055:132] [S2055:419] [S2056:3] [S2058:314] [S2075:25] [S2077:673] [S2078:1022] [S2078:1023]
secondary
Hannah BrooksNameHannah Brooks [S366:281] [S366:462] [S2055:365] [S2075:15]
secondary
Margaret StebbinsNameMargaret Stebbins [S2053] [S2075:7] [S2075:25]
secondary
Margaret StebbinsNameMargaret Stebbins [S2053] [S2075:7] [S2075:25]
secondary
Mary LesterNameMary Lester [S366:281] [S2058:370] [S2075:19]
secondary
Samuel FoxNameSamuel Fox , the elder [S2058:370] [S2075:7] [S2075:19] [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxNameSamuel Fox , the elder [S2058:370] [S2075:7] [S2075:19] [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxNameSamuel Fox , the elder [S2058:370] [S2075:7] [S2075:19] [S2075:25]
derivative
Daniel StebbinsNameSamuel Stebbins [S2075:7]
derivative
Thomas FoxNameThomas Fox [S366:281] [S366:462] [S2055:365] [S2058:370] [S2075]
secondary
Relationships
PersonClaimDetailEvidence
Anna FoxFatherSamuel Fox (~1705-1785) [S2055:132] [S2055:365] [S2056:37] [S2075:35]
derivative
Anna FoxMotherAbigail Harris (1711-) [S2055:132] [S2055:365] [S2056:37] [S2075:35]
derivative
Samuel FoxFatherSamuel Fox (1681-1754) [S2055:365] [S2075:25] [S2075:35] [S2080:41]
secondary
Samuel FoxFatherSamuel Fox (1681-1754) [S2055:365] [S2075:25] [S2075:35] [S2080:41]
secondary
Samuel FoxMotherMargaret Stebbins (1680-1752) [S2055:365] [S2075:25] [S2075:35]
derivative
Samuel FoxMotherMargaret Stebbins (1680-1752) [S2055:365] [S2075:25] [S2075:35]
derivative
Samuel FoxMotherMary Lester (1647-) [S2055:365] [S2058:370] [S2075:19]
derivative
Margaret StebbinsFatherDaniel Stebbins (e1641-) [S2053] [S2075:7] [S2075:25]
secondary
Margaret StebbinsFatherDaniel Stebbins (e1641-) [S2053] [S2075:7] [S2075:25]
secondary
Margaret StebbinsMotherBethiah Comstock (e1655-1713) [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxFatherThomas Fox (e1619-1658) [S2055:365] [S2058:370] [S2075:15]
derivative
Samuel FoxMotherHannah Brooks (e1620-1692) [S2055:365] [S2075:15]
derivative
Events & Attributes
PersonClaimDateDetailAgeEvidence
Thomas FoxImmigrationbef Mar 1644 [S2075:15]
derivative
Thomas FoxFreemanMar 1644Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S2055:365] [S2075:15]
derivative
Thomas FoxMarriage 2ndDec 13, 1647Hannah Brooks, Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S366:281] [S2075:15]
secondary
Samuel FoxBirth1651Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S366:281] [S2075:15] [S2075:19]
secondary
Samuel FoxBirth1651Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S366:281] [S2075:15] [S2075:19]
secondary
Thomas FoxWillJan 25, 1657/58Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S2075:15]
derivative
Thomas FoxDeathApr 14, 1658Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S366:281] [S2055:365] [S2075:15]
secondary
Thomas FoxInventoryApr 23, 1658Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States [S2075:15]
derivative
Samuel FoxLivingabt 1675New London, Connecticut, United States [S2055:365] [S2075:19]
derivative
Samuel FoxMarriage 1stMar 30, 1675/76Mary Lester, New London, Connecticut, United States [S366:281] [S2055:365] [S2058:370] [S2075:19]
secondary
Margaret StebbinsBirthNov 3, 1680New London, New London, Connecticut, United States [S2055:365] [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxBirthApr 24, 1681Montville, New London, Connecticut, United States [S2055:365] [S2058:370] [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxMarriageMar 25, 1703Margaret Stebbins [S2075:7] [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxMarriageMar 25, 1703Margaret Stebbins [S2075:7] [S2075:25]
derivative
Samuel FoxFlourished1704New London, Connecticut, United States [S2075:19]
named in the Patent of New London
derivative
Samuel FoxWillApr 6, 1727Montville, New London, Connecticut, United States [S2075:19]
derivative
Samuel FoxProbateSep 6, 1727Montville, New London, Connecticut, United States [S2075:19]
derivative
Samuel FoxProbateApr 12, 1785Montville, New London, Connecticut, United States [S2075:35]
derivative